Question:
Firefox???
†BURLYMAN†
2007-11-29 22:41:50 UTC
Pros and cons? thx
Ten answers:
d_v8ion
2007-11-29 23:34:41 UTC
I smile everytime I use Firefox



I cry everytime I use Internet Explorer
Amit S
2007-11-30 07:04:07 UTC
Cons:



* Doesn't work with some banking sites who seem to have only catered for IE.

* Not many others

* Not really compatible with sites that use ActiveX



Pros:

* An open source community is constantly working on Firefox so updates are rolled out very frequently and automatically to your browser. As a result, any security weaknesses, flaws and bugs that come to light are patched very quickly.

* It may be that because Firefox isn't as popular as IE, it hasn't been exploited as much, but i've never had my computer hijacked with any badware whilst using Firefox.

* One of Firefox's greatest strengths, is the ability to download add-ons of your choice. An add-on I have for example is the English spell check which automatically underlines words that are incorrectly spelt whilst typing (like now for example!). These add ons can be created by anyone who knows how and you can choose from a whole plethora.

*Firefox is lighter (i.e. uses less memory), and loads quicker.

*Firefox has and continues to lead the way with new innovations in browsing. One example is tabs - these were popularised by Firefox, and plagiurised by MS for IE7!





I can't recommend the browser highly enough. Give it a shot. Use it for a couple of weeks and see how it goes. If you have to uninstall it - the uninstall is very clean indeed with no traces left behind. But I don't think you'll get to that stage !!



All the best.
Tom
2007-12-02 17:09:21 UTC
The good: Firefox 2 adds built-in antiphishing protection, search engine suggestions, session restore, inline spell-checking, and Live Titles; the browser is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux; localized versions available in many different languages.



The bad: The Firefox 2 uninstall leaves behind a mess; some 1.5 version add-ons will break in 2.0; there are no thumbnail previews of open tabs; the browser doesn't yet pass the Web Standards Project Acid2 test.



The bottom line: Mozilla Firefox 2 is a winner, beating Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 on security, features, and overall cool factor.
graywolfman
2007-11-30 06:54:22 UTC
The pros are it doesn't have near the amount of vulnerabilities of Internet Explorer. It also has very widely used and open-source add-ons, is updated constantly, and truthfully Internet Explorer 7 seems to have ripped off many ideas from Firefox/Mozilla.

I have been using it since Firefox 1 and I love it. So many customizable settings and it is very secure. Definitely worth a look if even just to see if you like it or not.
Cali2AZ
2007-12-01 01:09:08 UTC
I can't give you all the pros and cons, but I use Firefox and I really like it! It's definitely worth checking out.
Xavier
2007-11-30 06:59:39 UTC
I know it's not up to date, but check it out...

it's gives a very good idea of some of the basic differences.



Also maybe most important, png alpha transparency support in Firefox is excellent !

I don't think IE supports it.. but I only have IE6, on a peace of crap Winblows pc I barely use.

I call it my crash box !



hth
2007-11-30 06:51:09 UTC
Pros:

Aside from security and Cross OS Platform the Extensions are so cool. They Really take browsing to the next level.



Cons:

Not as resource friendly as Opera. Not as secure as Opera.
2007-11-30 06:45:59 UTC
Pros:

It's not a piece of crap like IE

Cons:

It doesn't have some of the crap-like qualities IE has.



Trust me, it's a good browser



It's fast, secure, and customizable
lastHero
2007-11-30 06:58:03 UTC
safari is the best
Linda S
2007-11-30 07:02:36 UTC
I went to the web and this is what I found. I have it downloaded but not active as I am still using Internet explorer, but I do not like the new explorer so I am about ready to use fire fox



Mozilla Firefox is a web browser project managed by the Mozilla Corporation. Firefox's source code is available under the terms of the Mozilla tri-license as free and open source software.[1] By one measure Firefox has 14.85% of the world's market share in Web browsers as of October 2007,[2][3] making it the world's second most popular browser.



Features included with Firefox are tabbed browsing, spell checker, incremental find, live bookmarking, an integrated download manager, and a search system that includes Google. A third party developer network has created add-ons which provide specialist functionality. There are more than 2,000 add-ons,[4] with the most popular including FoxyTunes (controls music players), Adblock Plus (ad blocker), StumbleUpon (website discovery), DownThemAll! (download functions) and Web Developer (web tools).[5]



Firefox is cross-platform, providing support for various versions of Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. The current stable release of Firefox is version 2.0.0.10, released on 26 November 2007.[6]





Mozilla Firefox supports many web standards, including HTML, XML, XHTML, SVG 1.1 (partial)[20], CSS, ECMAScript (JavaScript), DOM, MathML, DTD, XSLT, XPath, and PNG images with alpha transparency.[21] Firefox also supports standards proposals created by the WHATWG such as client-side storage,[22][23] and canvas element.[24]



Although Firefox 2 does not pass the Acid2 standards-compliance test, development builds of Firefox 3 do.[25]





Security

Firefox uses a sandbox security model,[26] and limits scripts from accessing data from other web sites based on the same origin policy.[27] It uses SSL/TLS to protect communications with web servers using strong cryptography when using the https protocol.[28] It also provides support for web applications to use smartcards for authentication purposes.[29]



The Mozilla Foundation offers a "bug bounty" to researchers who discover severe security holes in Firefox.[30] Official guidelines for handling security vulnerabilities discourage early disclosure of vulnerabilities so as not to give potential attackers an advantage in creating exploits.[31]



Because Firefox has fewer and less severe publicly known unpatched security vulnerabilities than Internet Explorer (see Comparison of web browsers), improved security is often cited as a reason to switch from Internet Explorer to Firefox.[32][33][34][35] The Washington Post reports that exploit code for critical unpatched security vulnerabilities in Internet Explorer was available for 284 days in 2006. In comparison, exploit code for critical security vulnerabilities in Firefox was available for 9 days before Mozilla shipped a patch to remedy the problem.[36]



A 2006 Symantec study showed that although Firefox had surpassed other browsers in the number of vendor-confirmed vulnerabilities that year through September, these vulnerabilities were patched far more quickly than those found in other browsers.[37] Symantec later clarified their statement, saying that Firefox still had fewer security vulnerabilities than Internet Explorer, as counted by security researchers.[38] As of October 25, 2007, Firefox 2 has four security vulnerabilities unpatched, the most severe of which was rated "less critical" by Secunia.[39] Internet Explorer has eight security vulnerabilities unpatched, the most severe of which was rated "highly critical" by Secunia.[40]





Licensing

Firefox is free and open source software, and is tri-licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPL), GNU General Public License (GPL), and the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).[1] These licenses permit anyone to view, modify and/or redistribute the source code, and several publicly released applications have been built on it; for example, Netscape, Flock and Songbird make use of code from Firefox.



The official end-user builds of Firefox distributed from mozilla.com are licensed under the Mozilla EULA.[41] Several elements do not fall under the scope of the tri-license and have their use restricted by the EULA, including the trademarked Firefox name and artwork, and the proprietary Talkback crash reporter. Because of this and the clickwrap agreement included in the Windows version, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) consider these builds proprietary software.[42]



In the past, Firefox was licensed solely under the MPL,[43] which the FSF criticizes for being weak copyleft; the license permits, in limited ways, proprietary derivative works. Additionally, code under the MPL cannot legally be linked with code under the GPL or the LGPL.[44][45] To address these concerns, Mozilla re-licensed Firefox under the tri-license scheme of MPL, GPL, and LGPL. Since the re-licensing, developers have been free to choose the license under which they will receive the code, to suit their intended use: GPL or LGPL linking and derivative works when one of those licenses is chosen, or MPL use (including the possibility of proprietary derivative works) if they choose the MPL.[43]





Trademark and logo issues



The generic globe logo used when Firefox is compiled without the official brandingThe name "Mozilla Firefox" is a registered trademark; along with the official Firefox logo, it may only be used under certain terms and conditions. Anyone may redistribute the official binaries in unmodified form and use the Firefox name and branding for such distribution, but restrictions are placed on distributions which modify the underlying source code.[46]



To allow distributions of the code without using the official branding, the Firefox source code contains a "branding switch". This switch allows the code to be compiled without the official logo and name, for example to produce a derivative work unencumbered by restrictions on the Firefox trademark (this is also often used for betas and alphas of future Firefox versions). In the unbranded compilation the trademarked logo and name are replaced with a freely distributable generic globe logo and the name of the release series from which the modified version was derived. The name "Deer Park" is used for derivatives of Firefox 1.5, "Bon Echo" for derivatives of Firefox 2.0, and "Gran Paradiso" is used for derivatives of Firefox 3.0.



Outside of certain exceptions made for "community editions", distributing modified versions of Firefox under the "Firefox" name requires explicit approval from Mozilla for the changes made to the underlying code, and requires the use of all of the official branding. For example, it is not permissible to use the name "Firefox" without also using the official logo. When the Debian project decided to stop using the official Firefox logo in 2006 (because of restrictions on its use incompatible with the project's guidelines), they were told by a representative of the Mozilla Foundation that this was not acceptable, and were asked to either comply with the published trademark guidelines or cease using the "Firefox" name in their distribution.[47] Ultimately, Debian switched to branding their modified version of Firefox "Iceweasel".



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...