Now I'm dumping Skype, Y! Messenger, QQ etc, what should I use instead?

Question

I'm sick of all the separate communications systems: I have to turn on the Skype program to chat with other Skype users and ONLY other Skype users. Then I have to turn on another program to chat with Yahoo Messenger users and another with QQ users, and so on and so forth with all the others: MSN, AIM, ICQ, Facetime etc. And if there's a multi-service client, parts don't work because they're having to try and reverse-engineer these closed systems.

I don't have to pick up a Motorola phone to speak to another Motorola user and then pick up a Nokia phone to speak to someone with a Nokia. I don't have to have 4-5 different phones to talk to people, why should I have to have 4-5 different programs and jump between them just to speak to people online??

So I've decided to get rid of them all: Skype, Yahoo, QQ, everyone. I'm going with an open system accessible to all, just like the phone system. One ID, one program.

But it's unfamiliar territory for me, and I don't just need advice for myself (a semi-pro Windows & Linux user) but also easy options to recommend to family, friends and co-workers on Windows and Mac.

I need advice on which service to use. I see there are two open ones: SIP & XMPP.

And I need advice on which program to use to access whichever service.

Must-haves: PC-to-PC voice calls, video calls, IM, see online contacts, message saving, works on Windows.
Nice-to-haves: File transfers, calls to regular phones, calls to mobile phones, easy to use, stable, low-memory requirements, options for Linux/Mac.

Any guidance appreciated.

Answer 1

trillian

Answer 2

I even have never advised all and sundry to take an 'aggressive' dogs to a safeguard. as quickly as back the word 'aggressive' is getting used as a extensive term as a results of fact there are various varieties and reasons for as a result called 'aggression'. If human beings are available this website and say their dogs has KILLED different canines I even have my very own set of 'classes' on what they could desire to do with regard to the dogs and dumping it in a safeguard isn't one. If a individual comes in this website and says their dogs has critically bitten and/or attacked a individual supposedly unprovoked I notably propose euthanizing as a results of fact i've got not got faith dogs with unsound temperments could desire to be alive. there is no black and white. the grey components are obvious in many questions. you somewhat could desire to take each and each situation and seperate it from the 'sell off it the safeguard/get a coach/euthanize etc.' persons in this website who propose taking the dogs to the safeguard stay in a rose colored international. i in my view don't think those human beings have any inclination of what maximum shelters are like or what they're up against. not each and every dogs could properly be saved. No. To have that approach in quite unrealistic. genuine now, with the overpowering type of canines in shelters i've got not got faith a 'spot' could be made for a dogs of risky temperment as a results of genetically vulnerable neurosis. There at the instant are not adequate areas, running shoes and volunteers. In all certainty no dogs with a bite historic previous could be in a safeguard. The animal desires to be placed down. no rely if it may be saved or not is up for debate. Do the shelters have time for this? No. upload: In a suitable international all canines could be owned by utilising to blame people who prepare, no dogs could have genetic subject concerns, there could be no doggy generators and back backyard breeders and the shelters could have empty areas. we don't stay in this variety of worldwide neither can we ever. So, the individuals who opt for each and every dogs to have of venture go get the dogs! There are approximately SEVEN canines for each guy, lady and toddler in shelters. SEVEN. canines could desire to be euthanized. the place is the realism right here? awaken, human beings.

Answer 3

Don't chat with anybody then.